The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Jun Rowley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable as the best I found was nothing convincingly better here, here, here and here and this hasn't changed much since starting in September 2011. Pinging tagger Cameron Scott and author Davemendez. SwisterTwister talk 22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - non-notable. --Cameron Scott (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as promo for an individual who may one day be notable, but is not notable now. TOO SOON at minimum. Quis separabit? 19:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:UPANDCOMING? Bearian (talk) 18:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - There was a nice piece at FastWeb, which might point to it being WP:TOOSOON, but other than that, just trivial mentions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.