The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 20:41, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matrix Fitness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources I could find after looking are primary sources and routine coverage from fitness websites. The refs already in the article are also mostly press releases and fitness websites. There isn't really anything that meets WP:SIGCOV. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Business. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 20:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. I don't see any proof of notability here per WP:GNG. Most sources are either primary or not independent, and there doesn't seem to be significant coverage. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 21:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Promotional article by WP:SPA. No WP:SIGCOV --John B123 (talk) 22:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above and per WP:TNT. Editor with 4 edits recreated this page that is basically spam. In 2025, everyone knows that Wikipedia is not a social media platform or free web hosting service. Bearian (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.