The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kootikooti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been notability tagged for 5 years. I was completely unable to find any reliable sources; the only search results that even seemed relevant were a game using this name as a trademark. —Darkwind (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 02:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 02:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not seem to be a widely coverage or notable game. I would also say that under WP:NOTHOWTO that the article has very little content outside the rules of the game. Mkdw^talk 00:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot establish notability after 5 years, no reliable sources Retrolord (talk) 09:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.