The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Kilganon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced WP:BLP of a person with no strong claim to passing WP:NATHLETE -- his notability claim is resting on self-published YouTube videos rather than any conventional sports achievement. And for sourcing, what we have here is one 100-word blurb, one Q&A style interview in which he's talking about himself, and one piece on a commercial athletic training company's WordPress blog -- which means none of the sourcing here is good enough to grant him a WP:GNG pass either. Basically he's a WP:BLP1E at best. Bearcat (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete one youtube video does not make a person notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable YouTube wannabee celebrity. Smartyllama (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No assertion of notability. Enigma^msg 23:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unremarkable YouTuber. DrStrauss talk 16:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.