The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. No prejudice against recreation as a redirect as suggested in the last comment. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 21:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Manifold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if Jack Manifold meets notability guidelines on his own. The refs are mostly about other streamers rather than him and a WP:BEFORE didn't turn up much that's useful. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not impressed with the sourcing. This [1] isn't a RS, but devotes much space to the individual. I just don't think this person has hit the mainstream media enough to warrant an article here. Oaktree b (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There don't seem to be any notable achievements or projects from this person as they all seem to be projects from other people that he had small supporting roles in. Not sure if any of it warrants a personal article. Agrumpykitty (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete (room for improvement) Personally I don't have much of a say as i haven't done this for very long, but, while I believe that while Jack Manifold's page is sloppy, it can be improved, Manifold has done a fair bit of good stuff in his time and is arguably a big content creator, just wanted to say my piece, thanks. The Linear (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Linear, what "room for improvement"? All I see from this search is mostly walls upon walls of content farm slop. This is very obviously an article that lacks notability and should be deleted; his popularity doesn't mean anything here.

Delete. — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 02:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. MK at your service. 12:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dream SMP. Notability is not shown in references. Mockapedia (talk) 19:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.