The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Industries et Agro-Ressources (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References fail the criteria in WP:NCORP for establishing notability, just run-of-the-mill company notices. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I'm reluctant to delete anarticle abouta Frenchinstitution that theFrench WP considers notable enough to cover, but, just as the nom says, it does not meet our standards. There's nothing addition in the rench version tohelp. DGG ( talk ) 21:45, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete. The contested subject here does not pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. We find only advertorials, listings in catalogues, or corporate sites. -The Gnome (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.