The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna be the guy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No assertion of notability besides a forum of fans, a review on a website that launched early this year and a blog mention -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've added references to Boing Boing, Independent Gaming Source and Consolenauts coverage of the game. I think this is a fairly well written article and has enough sources to make it reliable.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 11:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I found but didn't add the following sources [1], [2], ,[3]--Torchwood Who? (talk) 11:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, now adequately sourced. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 11:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. grrowl (talk) 08:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pixelface (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above additions, good job! TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 17:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. It is notable and now contains more than enough sources. Damn deletionists. :) Celarnor (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.