The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Green Line "E" Branch. Bishonen | talk 15:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde Square (MBTA station) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed railway station that is, according to the source, at least 15 years in the future. The extension has not entered the state or federal funding pipelines, which would make it an official project rather than a wish-list item. Per WP:CRYSTALBALL, there's no reason to have a speculative stub article that is a decade or more from ever needing expansion or having more sources. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Definitely WP:CrystalBall. SW3 5DL (talk) 23:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Green Line "E" Branch where the line-extension proposal is discussed appropriately. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I'm inclined to delete. I question whether this is even a search term worth redirecting, and there's nothing to merge not already in the E Branch article -- which as a standalone paragraph regarding a line with over a half century of history, a good deal of press and ligitation, and many service changes, dings WP:UNDUE. We're not talking any initiative by the MBTA, we're talking something on a single municipality's wishlist going into a mayoral election. No doubt Hizzoner would enjoy sewing up the JP vote, but that doesn't equate to notability. Ravenswing 08:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect - there's nothing to merge here. If Go Boston 2030 ever becomes something more than a red link, it should go there, but until then, point it to Green Line "E" Branch. — Train2104 (t • c) 19:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.