The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 23:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humza Bin Masood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

User removed PROD template. Simply said, no indication of importance nor notability. BiH (talk) 06:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete Fails WP:N, specifically WP:NACADEMIC nothing in the article even attempts to establish why this individual is notable in his field. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 08:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. and Gene93k. BLP - Twenty-three years old and a devoted social worker. --Bejnar (talk) 01:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.