The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep Sceptre ^(talk) 18:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoenn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

It's basicly a walkthrough! As per the Walkthrough and FAQ rule in WP:NOT I nominate thee as an Artcle for Deletion. --Fivexthethird (talk) 19:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per my reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johto. Dekkappai (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Dekkappai (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per my reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johto, [1]. I also did a major copyedit and trim for this article, [2]. Artichoker^talk 21:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Seems to be a violation of WP:POINT --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above comments, and per this post I'm thinking this nomination (and the other two) are bad-faith WP:POINT noms Abwayax (c :: t) 01:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but reference. Based on the other two similar articles nominated, cleanup can be done here also to bring it up to standards. —C.Fred (talk) 04:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.