The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 23:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guntz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non notable, no nontrivial coverage by reliable third parties. Lacks many references and only has gamefaqs links. --Banime (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — original research does not pay. Sources given are either not considered verifiable sources, tell nothing, or are dead links.
• Note — I would also consider looking at Klonoa for AfD, as well, since that article is basically the same in problems as this. MuZemike (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 01:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - no notability here. Eusebeus (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Making an appropriate article for the purpose of this and related characters--there does not seem to be a combined list of characters for the series, or even a general article on the series, just on the individual games. This would be, as usual, the way to handle relatively minor characters. This is just one of the antagonists, if I understand correctly. DGG (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Plot summary, game guide, and in-universe material. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. non notable because there are no reliable third-party sources that cover the subject. Randomran (talk) 20:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.