The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 21:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Moore (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Yet. Has published 1 book and has 1 credit as a screenwriter. Only mere mentions and primary source as main refs with 1 washington post reference. Fails WP:GNG. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with nom. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. One novel on the NYT bestseller list, plus screenwriter of a major film is plenty notable. --Delirium (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Doesn't make him notable if there are no references to back it, thus why I stated it fails GNG. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. See Variety review of The Imitation Game and
  Lou Lumenick's review of The Imitation Game at the Toronto International Film Festival.
  SBaker43 (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • That article is about the film not him, GNG requires significant coverage, that of which I have not found for him. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The author of a book on the NYT bestseller list is notable, and ditto for a book made into a significant film. For one book, there's sometimes a question of whether the article should be on the author or the book, but with more than one work, it's the author. Clearly and unabiguously meets WP:CREATIVE. DGG ( talk ) 21:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.