The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 04:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eschalon: Book I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Sources here amount to a couple of reviews, of which only one is in a reliable source, and neither actually establishes notability though they may be sufficient for inclusion in a directory (which we are not, of course). Most of the lengthy article is sourced from the game's forums, comments by BasilistWrangler, meticulously cited with namechecks by BasiliskWrangler (talk · contribs), who appears to be the developer: [1]. Guy (Help!) 20:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep In addition to the usable Mac World article already there, there's a review on Total PC Gaming (Imagine Publishing), according to GameSpot it was reviewed in three major gaming magazines: PC Zone / PC Format / Pelit. A short piece on Play This Thing by Greg Costikyan and a decent sized review on Gamezebo. There's scads of reliable sources which collectively cover it well. Someoneanother 02:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Metacritic lists four reviews. Moby games lists three additional reviews. SharkD (talk) 04:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep & tag for cleanup. Per Someone another and SharkD, enough RS exist. Nom interpretation of WP:N confuses "importance" with support of WP:V MLauba (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and cleanup — sources above show that notability is easily established. MuZemike 21:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.