The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Evil saltine (talk) 08:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elite Educational Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching finds just a passing mention, but not significant coverage, in the LA Times, and that's about it. Thus, it fails the notability requirements. Cybercobra (talk) 01:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lack of third party sources. Notability is questionable Look like an advertisement, especially with this sentence: "EEI has successfully helped many students achieve 2400s or very high scores on the SAT."Jolenine (Talk - Contribs) 01:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no third-party sources to establish notability and the articles reads like an advertisement. ArcAngel (talk) 05:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.