The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 04:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ELRA Language Resources Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a G12 and borderline G11 with no policy compliant version, but it has been here since 2006 so I don't feel comfortable speedying it. The broader issue however is I cannot find WP:ORG compliant sourcing to stub it back to, so we're here. Star Mississippi 00:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Organizations, France, and Luxembourg. Star Mississippi 00:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Courtesy @Diannaa who raised adajacent CV concerns with the creator but also didn't delete this. Star Mississippi 00:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I left a notice of this AfD at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.