The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Rlendog (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Mastrogiorgio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Article lacks references and the text gives no reason to support notability. Does not pass WP:BIO standards. And Adoil Descended (talk) 03:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I created the article, but if others agree that the actor is not notable enough to support having his own article, then I am happy for it to be removed. Christophee (talk) 14:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep Initially, I see the fellow as meeting WP:ENT, and then in searches I see that he is sourcable for his work in theater as well.[1] While I see that it was poorly sourced only to IMDB when nominated, I see its potential. And THAT is something we can address. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree. That Google search digs up a lot of repetition of a few articles, mostly reviews where the actor is a small part of a larger work. As I am reading WP:ENT and WP:BIO, he does not qualify under notability requirements for this website. And Adoil Descended (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.