- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. but rename and rework to be about the company Mime Radio not the person. JohnCD (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Damon de Szegheo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The prod was contested. I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 00:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find significant coverage of him. Jujutacular T · C 05:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular T · C 05:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep and rework as an article on The Mime Radio Recording Company which recorded numerous notable artists. This gentleman can be covered there. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to be clear, are you suggesting the creation of The Mime Radio Recording Company and making Damon de Szegheo a redirect to there? Jujutacular T · C 17:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- More like a merge. The content in this article is appropriate for an article on the broader subject of the record company rather than in its present form about the chief executive. The company is notable, the executive not so much (in so far as I can tell). I'm willing to do it boldly, but sometimes have objected to that approach, so I'll let the discussion proceed first. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I could support that. Jujutacular T · C 18:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- More like a merge. The content in this article is appropriate for an article on the broader subject of the record company rather than in its present form about the chief executive. The company is notable, the executive not so much (in so far as I can tell). I'm willing to do it boldly, but sometimes have objected to that approach, so I'll let the discussion proceed first. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
You must be logged in to post a comment.