The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Captive white tigers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has serious long-standing source issues, and seems to me to be a massive violation of WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Not sure why these are more notable then white tigers in general. Sourcing is fine, but this is an extended list with no indication as to why having a tiger in captivity is notable ("financial reasons" given is rather vague). Oaktree b (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Too much detail, and no clear reason why the topic is notable. The vast majority of white tigers are captive, and this fact can be noted in the main article. AryKun (talk) 02:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.