The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Business Enterprise Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is fully promotional, mostly unsourced, and from a quick search I haven't found anything significant about this organisation (just other organisations with the same name). Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 22:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 22:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: my reference search hasn't turned up anything specific with any depth to satisfy NCORP microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.