The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 01:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bottomless pit (gaming) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unverified original research with no indication of notability. seresin ( ¡? )  01:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete useless article and notability is not established. Does anyone really care that a bottomless pit is bottomless? RP459 (talk) 02:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no evidence that this feature is notable. Sounds like WP:Synth or even WP:OR. JJL (talk) 02:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - original research, uninteresting, and certainly non-notable in terms of having its own article. ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 10:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence that the pits are really bottomless. Redddogg (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Original research, and whiny original research at that. Example quote: "Bottomless pits are considered by many to be the easiest way out of constructing genuinely clever level mechanisms." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow delete because, damn.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 17:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm going to take my favorite quote from Wikipedia: "It seems like fluff trying to be elaboration." That basically sums up the article. NintendoNerd777 (talk) 00:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it lacks notability and has no merit on its own. L337 kybldmstr (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.