The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted and create-protection Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 05:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bluemoon Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Game developer with no real claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Article speedied twice today, created a third time by a different editor whose only edit was to create this page, then the speedy deletion tag on it was removed by the creator of the first two versions. 0 gnews hits and just 30 ghits for this organization, none of which show a whiff of notability. Skipping prod because I know the tag will be removed in minutes. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was misconsidered for deletion. The article is alright and should remain available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spyro02 (talk • contribs) 22:20, March 7, 2009 (UTC) — Spyro02 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete per nom. Not a notable developer. --Frehley^{Space Ace} 22:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- this article is just promotion for the non-notable organization in question. Reyk _YO! 22:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Protect Page Creation Since its been speedied twice today it should be protected from being created §hawnpoo 22:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Protect Page Creation. I tried to talk to the author of this article on his talk page in order to convince him to leave the article in his user space and build it up slowly but he just blanked his discussion page. Likewise on the previously existing discussion page at Talk:Bluemoon Games he did not seem interested in proving notability and instead seemed to assume we all had an agenda against him. Also note that this article has been deleted three times on the German Wikipedia (de:Bluemoon Games). Lastly, I think the page should be salted because this author has created his article a total of at least seven times including once with a lowercase g. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User:Spyro02 is repeatedly removing the AfD tag from the article. I've given him a final warning on this.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete (G11 or A7) and create-protect – (edit conflict) article written like a PR piece, which falls under WP:SPAM. One could also argue failure to indicate why this company is important, which falls under A7. Also request generous amount of salt due to the repeated recreation. MuZemike 00:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I added the speedy delete tag and put it in RFPP lets see what happens §hawnpoo 00:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.