The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blog rally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable term; arguably not a term at all. Other than the Engage With Grace reference, the sources seem to be in-passing usage of the two words next to each other, or not even that. Walsh90210 (talk) 01:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Can barely find anything even mentioning the term. Looks like an attempt at promotion. C F A 💬 00:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of significant coverage of the concept. Right now, it’s a disordered list of poor examples. A better example might be Yearly Kos. Bearian (talk) 02:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.