The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Better decisions group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline G11 eligible Article on an Organization that fails to meet WP:ORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search turns up nothing of substance, all I can observe are hits in primary sources, press releases and user generated content, all of which we do not consider reliable. Needless to say there is no WP:ORGDEPTH. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article about a consultancy firm, created on a new account's 11th edit, and featuring promotional wording. Awards from partner firms and sponsorship of sports teams do not in themselves indicate notability. Such coverage as I can find (such as the recent opening in the UK of their first international office) falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A clear fail under WP:NCORP. Edwardx (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral it is not that notable but the article itself is acceptable. It is mostly alright except the article is not very important and so i'm leaving it at neutral. Dawn Lim (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.