The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bardwell Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, after the first sentence it only talks about buildings on the road, many of which have their own articles. Sources 3-5 are not independent. Rschen7754 19:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom. Rschen7754 19:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — the road has its own entry in the Hibbert encyclopedia and Hinchcliffe book. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • And again, is there more that can be written using those sources than just the road's existence? --Rschen7754 20:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly notable, sourced and meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Obviously notable and well sourced. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Well cited, notable, and meets WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 13:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes GNG. I see nothing wrong with the buildings on the road having a brief description here and a more detailed treatment (hopefully) in their own articles. This must happen all the time. I imagine that Buckingham Palace has a mention in the article on London as well as it's own article. P.S. Let me know if there is no article on Buckingham Palace and I will create it. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: there are multiple sources that indicate the subject of this article passes WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.