The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Banpresto Originals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This doesn't seem to be an official term used to differentiate this series from the rest of the Super Robot Wars series, so this just seems to be original research. Even if it does turn out to be an official term, it can easily fit in the main article. TTN (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I am also nominating the related trivial list:

Designers of the Banpresto Originals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Delete both - No source for notability. Also, I finally bothered to look it up. Super Robot Wars has its own Wiki. That's where all these bloody articles should be.--Boffob (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Clear lack of notability. When will these end? Icemotoboy (talk) 02:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both. All other similar articles were deleted. Nothing here neither. And we may have to add Banpresto Original Mecha as well. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as we did with all the other Super Robots articles (more than 60). No notability. -- nips (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.