The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baggins of Hobbiton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a genealogy. The Baggins as a family are not notable, although Bilbo and Frodo are. Fails WP:GNG. A family is not notable because two members are notable. We only have articles on families when many members are notable, or the family itself as a unit is notable, like the Bush family. Hog Farm (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:ALLPLOT; doesn't inherit notability from its two notable members. – sgeureka ^t•c 21:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete We do not need to have articles on families that only have two notable members. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 23:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete better suited for a LOTR fandom Wiki, not Wikipedia. No secondary coverage, it seems to have been taken straight out of the back of LOTR. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 02:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. We hates it (and its relatives) forever. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a place to put tables and explanation sourced to an appendix of a fictional book all about fictional things.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Bilbo Baggins. Goustien (talk) 05:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.