The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mike V • Talk 00:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amitabh Bachchan Sikh riots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

can be merged with main amitabh bachan article Uncletomwood (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Nominating user has not given any reason why this page should be deleted. Uncletomwood if you think it should be merged then use a merge proposal instead. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the content of this article has been deleted from Amitabh Bachchan on several occasions because of BLP issues, weighting, prose style and copyright violation. As such, this really amounts to a POV fork by someone who is determined to get the information on Wikipedia by one means or another. I rather think that it may still contain copyright violations. - Sitush (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The content of the article looks correct, as this thing did appear in Media, however it doesn't require an article of its own. It was an allegation (without any proff) which was refuted by Amitabh Bachchan and also no further action is taken by any government or SGPC. The content of the article can however be inducted into 1984 Anti-Sikh riots, however after changing the tone a bit.--Vigyani (talk) 02:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is not a notable event deserving its own article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not deserve an independent article. A sentence or two may be added in Amitabh Bachchan. Salih (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.