The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All Tvvins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical group, fails to meet WP:MUSIC. Admittedly, I could be converted based on Adam 9007's comments on the article talk page. Thanks, Adam9007 for the follow up. reddogsix (talk) 01:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. In addition to the links on the talk page there is a lot of articles primariliy about them or their work:

Garratt, Rob (22 August 2016), "Album review: All Tvvins's debut LP llVV delivers deceptively smart, head-nodding material", The National

"LISTEN UP", Irish Independent, 13 August 2016

Murphy, Lauren (12 August 2016), "ALL TVVINS IIVV HHHHWarner Bros", The Irish Times

Carroll, Jim (12 August 2016), "Double exposure", The Irish Times

Murphy, Lauren (7 August 2016), "Tvvins Peak", Sunday Times

Garratt, Rob (2 April 2016), "Review: All Tvvins fail to impress the crowd in Dubai", The National

Ward, James (22 January 2016), "All Tvvins have had a busy year", Irish Mirror

Also available are less convincing but easily accessable resources. [1] [2].

Enough for GNG. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some links [3] [4] [5] duffbeerforme (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. WP:GNG seems to be met. (Per GeoffreyT2000, there would seem to enough coverage in reliable sources where the band are the primary subject of the articles. If they were fleeting mentions, GNG/SIGCOV would likely not be met. But as the band are the primary topic of those articles, GNG would seem to be covered.) As regards WP:NMUSIC, that would seem to be met based on the verifiable charting of the album w/o 19 Aug 2016. Looks OK to me. Guliolopez (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.