The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 13:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Against Happiness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Ambiguous title, so redirect anywhere could be misleading. Non-notable author. Boleyn (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Health and fitness. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Easily passes BOOK, with the NPR in the article and the Publishers Weekly [1] and an NYT review [2]. Oaktree b (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The NYT review is especially strong. Toughpigs (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: 2 reviews above is enough to meet WP:NBOOK. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.