The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with and redirect to List of minor planets: 23001–24000. Full listing period has passed. (non-admin closure)--xanchester (t) 03:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

23804 Haber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No cited references, and no assertion of notability. Other minor planets have been either collected into a list (redirect) when it already exists, or deleted entirely. ReformedArsenal (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with List of minor planets: 23001–24000 ReformedArsenal (talk) 02:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge/Delete Non-notable. I seldom defend main belt asteroids that are numbered above 5000 and do not even get a reputable blog hit with Google. -- Kheider (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect' to list of minor planets: 23001-24000. Still a possible search term, but certainly not deserving of its own article, for the reasons mentioned by others. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.