Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    User:Nahraf Moha reported by User:Jfire (Result: Indeffed)

    Page: Afar Triangle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Nahraf Moha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 04:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Environment */ The Hadu tribe is one of several prominent clans within the Afar ethnic group, primarily residing in the northeastern regions of Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti."
    2. 03:48, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Environment */ The Hadu tribe is one of several prominent clans within the Afar ethnic group, primarily residing in the northeastern regions of Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti."
    3. 03:34, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1279195887 by Jfire (talk)"
    4. 02:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "the Hadu tribe is an integral part of the Afar ethnic group, contributing to the rich tapestry of cultures in East Africa. Their traditions, language, and way of life reflect their deep connection to the land and their resilience in adapting to changing circumstances."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 02:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "General note: Using a large language model on Afar Triangle."
    2. 03:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Afar Triangle."
    3. 03:49, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Afar Triangle."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 03:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Hadu Tribe */ new section"

    Comments:

    User is inserting unsourced, AI generated content, continuing behavior from February on other articles. No response to repeated attempts to engage on talk pages. Jfire (talk) 04:38, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Similar behavior, involving the same content, observed in the article Afar language:
    1. 03:10, 7 March 2025 "the Hadu tribe is an integral part of the Afar ethnic group, contributing to the rich tapestry of cultures in East Africa. Their traditions, language, and way of life reflect their deep connection to the land and their resilience in adapting to changing circumstances."
    2. 07:22, 7 March 2025 "Within the Afar ethnic group, the "Hadu" tribe is one of several notable clans that are mostly found in the northeastern parts of Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti. The nomadic lifestyle and rich cultural legacy of the Afar people are influenced by the arid" LandLing 08:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Indefinitely blocked Nothing useful has come of this account's edits; nothing useful looks likely either. Add that to the edit-warring, lack of communication and use of LLMs, you get an indefinite block. Black Kite (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Hlogoogle reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Pblocked from article)

    Page: Dhandhor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Hlogoogle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 11:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* top */reverted"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 08:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC) to 10:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
      1. 08:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Etymology */ deletion code"
      2. 09:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* top */added some more information with referance"
      3. 09:23, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* physical Structure */ added more information with referance"
      4. 10:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* top */move page"
    3. Consecutive edits made from 06:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC) to 07:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
      1. 06:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* History */ stop using false information and source related to dhadhor. darhore is a different clan"
      2. 07:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Etymology */ added some more information with referance"
      3. 07:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Racial description */ reverted"
      4. 07:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Culture */ added true information with source"
    4. Consecutive edits made from 01:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC) to 01:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
      1. 01:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Racial description */ added true information with survey report."
      2. 01:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Culture */ remove wrong information.

    those source are not related to Dhadhor sub-caste."

    1. 01:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Racial description */ added true information related to dhadhor or dadhor with source"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 17:48, 6 March 2025 (UTC) to 18:20, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
      1. 17:48, 6 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Racial description */ added true information related to dhanhor or dhador"
      2. 18:20, 6 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Culture */ gwala and dadhor are two different caste.added with sourse gwala culture. and remove false information"
    3. Consecutive edits made from 17:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC) to 17:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
      1. 17:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Racial description */ dhadhor is also known as dharhor. Lotan Ram Nishad has described Dhadhor Yadav as fair skin tone. I'm addded two referance."
      2. 17:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC) "/* top */dhador or danhor name is correct it is metioned in some books."
    4. Consecutive edits made from 10:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC) to 11:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
      1. 10:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Culture */ added some more information with referance"
      2. 11:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC) "/* Racial description */ added some more information with referance"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Comments:

    Addition of WP:OR and POV-push. They have been reverted and warned by multiple users and asked to seek WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page. Pinging @Jessicapierce, Ekdalian, and Almakhhdum:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:00, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Partial blocked from the article for a year. Regardless of the quality of the additions, when you're edit warring against five other people you would think that might make you stop and think. But, apparently not. Black Kite (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:74.56.74.63 reported by User:MrOllie (Result: Blocked one week)

    Page: Paul Barbeau (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 74.56.74.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 20:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1279478039 by MrOllie (talk)"
    2. 20:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1279477459 by MrOllie (talk)"
    3. 20:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1279451205 by MrOllie (talk)"
    4. 13:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC) "Added a source from Deadline article proving role as Executive Producer."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 20:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 20:18, 8 March 2025 (UTC) on User talk:74.56.74.63 "/* March 2023 */"

    Comments:

    Self promotional edit warring by COI editor, trying to turn article into a resume. MrOllie (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    This is also evasion of the block they received as User:PressFilmLaInsider. MrOllie (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:86.160.247.245 reported by User:Iiii I I I (Result: )

    Pages:

    User being reported: 86.160.247.245 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    • TVR:
      • Special:Diff/1278997114 (March 5, 2025)
      • Special:Diff/1279037077 (March 6, 2025)
      • Special:Diff/1279056572 (March 6, 2025)
    • TVR Griffith:
      • Special:Diff/1278997417 (March 5, 2025)
      • Special:Diff/1279074709 (March 6, 2025)
      • Special:Diff/1279224488 (March 7, 2025)

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1279149070 (March 6, 2025)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:TVR#TVR's status since 2013

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1279559659 (March 9, 2025)

    Comments:
    At the advice of S0091, I'm reporting User:86.160.247.245 here for edit warring on both TVR and TVR Griffith. The most recent one (Special:Diff/1279224488) came after requests from me not to remove sourced information, and talk page warnings from two other users.

    I don't know if this is needed here, but to summarize the content dispute: TVR is a car manufacturer that went defunct in 2013, and was then bought and revived with plans to create a new version of the TVR Griffith. The IP apparently does not believe this is relevant to the articles and has removed mention of the revival from both pages. --Iiii I I I (talk) 07:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    It was not revived at all. There were and are no plans to create a new Griffith. There was only an unfinished show car, built eight years ago by Gordon Murray Automotive, which Les Edgar used to con deposit-payers and the Welsh Government out of a lot of money. No R&D was ever done, the show car was never road-registered, not one single development car was ever built, and no customer car was ever delivered. The factory has been repossessed by the Welsh Government, and the premises to which the various TVR companies are still registered at Companies House is no longer owned by Les Edgar either, having been sold last year. TVR is deader than John Cleese's parrot! 86.160.247.245 (talk) 07:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A failed revival is still worthy of mention, especially when covered by multiple reliable sources. IP seems likely to continue edit warring and is WP:NOTHERE. Iiii I I I (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:170.62.100.225 reported by User:Technopat (Result: Blocked)

    Page: Homeland Party (United Kingdom) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 170.62.100.225 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 11:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1279589008 by Technopat (talk) Revert slander/defamation edit warring - talk on talk page"
    2. 11:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1279588534 by Technopat (talk) Unexplained revert - not edit warring (this is my first edit)"
    3. 11:13, 9 March 2025 (UTC) "Neutral point of view, poor quality sources"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 11:48, 9 March 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."
    2. 11:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC) "Replied."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User:Theonewithreason reported by User:SigillumVert (Result: )

    Page: Prince Marko (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Theonewithreason (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [1]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [2]
    2. [3]
    3. [4]


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [5]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [6]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [7]

    Comments:
    User has repeatedly inserted information about Livno being a part of medieval Serbia despite that being contradicted on that by every single scholarly source in the article and even the ones they themselves presented in the talk. Overall hostile and combative editing, combined with unfounded accusations sockpuppetry. Blatant disregard for wikipedia policy on sourcing and verification of content.

    Speaking of which I am not the one who started with edit warring and also I am the one who first started talk on tp [[8]], which SigillumVert ignored, they also ignored WP:onus and started attacking me which is obvious by their comments on the tp [[9]], [[10]] as for edit warring , here are the diffs that show that this editor is the one who started with them.

    User:SigillumVert edit warring on Prince Marko page

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. [[11]] "Warning: Three-revert rule."
    2. [[12]]
    3. [[13]]

    As for hostile and combative editing, as presented above [[14]], [[15]] the editor SigillumVert has neither shown a will to reach consensus or willing to cooperate instead insulting, therefore this should be a case of WP:boomerang also this report is filled incorrectly, since the editor left the warning note on my page and then immediately reported me [[16]], [[17]] which implies on WP:gaming Theonewithreason (talk) 18:57, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Theonewithreason: What's the basis for your allegation that SigillumVert is socking?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    My warning was implied on removal of sourced content which I mentioned that they did on Prince Marko page, the note of warning of wp:sockpuppetry is used as standard warning of wikipedia policy, as mentioned as others like WP:or or WP:synth which also were also included. [] Theonewithreason (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What consensus is there to be reached when one editor is clearly wrong according to all available sources and his additions to the article contradict the cited references? You insist on having it your way when you have been proven wrong. Hardly the spirit of building an encyclopaedia. SigillumVert (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:3rrn
    No tags for this post.