The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ImagesMvF.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sointo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source CutOffTies (talk) 02:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would have F9'd this as it is most likely from the food network, but the credits were blacked out & tineye doesn't show a match because of that. Skier Dude (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found several matches on tineye but all of them were stale. Eeekster (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argothlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gorepriest ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orphaned, UE, no target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, orphan and logo that I doubt that is under a free license. mabdul 01:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhp-portals.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gorepriest ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, no need for what appears to be a fake album cover Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, orphan and logo that I doubt that is under a free license. mabdul 01:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zardoniclogo.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gorepriest ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, no target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, orphan and logo that I doubt that is under a free license. mabdul 01:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djzsubsonicover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gorepriest ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, no need for what appears to be a fake album cover Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, orphan and logo that I doubt that is under a free license. mabdul 01:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus, leaning keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:KubrickLolita2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WickerGuy ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This beautiful non-free screenshot of a key scene of Stanley Kucbrick's Lolita is not necessary for the understanding of out article on Stanley Kucbrick, in a way that satisfies WP:NFCC#8. That is, the lack of this imagery would not be detrimental to the article reader's understanding of the specific point being made. The text makes a point about the scene where the underage girl kisses-goodbye her stepfather while he plays chess and says some double entendre phrase ("I take your queen"). The movie is filled with such double entendre sayings and scenes, as it's an adaption of a book over the controversial topic of pedophilia (to put it simple). Still, the very same point can be done without the aid of an image of the girl kissing-goodbye the man playing chess. The crucial of the point is not captured by this image, but explained in the article's text (much better than I did in this nomination). And the image is doing the work of an efficient eye-grabber for this important passage on the text. damiens.rf 05:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The criterion of WP:NFCC#8 is not that it the image is essential to the reader's understanding but that it will "significantly increase" the reader's understanding, which this image satisfies in ways that are fairly obvious. This images shows an example of how the film contains visual complements to the verbal double entendres which are interwoven with each other. What is wrong with being an "eye-grabber" FOR this important passage on the text. That surely goes beyond being "purely decorative". This is a blatantly pedantic nomination.--WickerGuy (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who mentioned "essential"? --damiens.rf 06:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not, but you did assert that the file was not necessary for the understanding of our article; it is reasonable to point out that this is not the test, and the proper question is whether it significantly increases reader understanding of the topic -- i.e. understanding about the director and his career.

On the other hand, if WickerGuy accepts that the principal value of this image is to be an "eye-grabber", he might as well go home.

The case for this image is that it shows how far Kubrick was able to go, and that the quality of the apparent sensuality of the image goes beyond what would be conveyed simply by text, in a way which does contribute significantly to understanding about the director's career. Jheald (talk) 22:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First a reply. I accept that the image is an "eye-grabber" but not that it is its principal value. I was simply trying to point out that while the image is in one sense "decorative", it is not at all merely decorative.

Now further comment. To put my earlier remarks differently, multiple qualities of this film converge in this one picture. Humbert's manipulativeness (symbolized by the chess-game), Charlotte's naivete, the use of double-entendres and indirect symbolism in the film, the semi-concealed sensuality, and the provocativeness of the subject-matter. In a way, this photo is virtually both a plot and thematic synopsis of the entire first half of the film!! Hence, its suitability as an illustration of the nature of the film in the Kubrick article.--WickerGuy (talk) 23:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now slightly revised the picture's caption in the article Stanley Kubrick to better reflect the picture's importance.--WickerGuy (talk) 00:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong revision of picture caption

I have now radically revised the picture caption in the article, which includes moving some of the material about Lolita having been a controversial novel into the main text body of the article.

New caption:

Critic Thomas Allen Nelson, has noted that chess is a favorite motif of both novelist Vladimir Nabokov, and Stanley Kubrick, and the entire film is metaphorically a "cinematic chess game", embodying themes of "deception and enchantment".[40] Here (in a scene not in the source novel), as Humbert plays chess with Lolita's mother, he says "I take your Queen" while Lolita kisses stepfather Humbert goodnight, an example of how the film toned down overt sexuality and hinted at through gestures or dialogue, much of the latter with double entendres.

Original caption (without intermediate slight revision)

Lolita was one of the most controversial novels of the century, given its theme[40]. Any kind of overt sexual content had to be toned down significantly for Kubrick's film adaptation, and most of the sexual acts between its title character and Humbert are only hinted at. Here, Lolita kisses her stepfather Humbert goodnight while he plays chess with her mother (Shelley Winters) while stating "I take your Queen".

• Comment it seems as though it should be in the film article Lolita (1962 film), to illustrate what it illustrates, per current caption on Kubrick's article. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 06:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• CommentDamiens has not provided a convincing argument that the image would not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and that its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. On the contrary, it seems to me to illustrate perfectly the way Kubrick deftly uses double-entendre in imagery and dialog to get his point across. I believe the reader would benefit greatly by being able to see what the section is talking about. There's much more going on there than merely "decoration". As Damiens says - "The movie is filled with such double entendre sayings and scenes", and therefore a good example of one of those deserves to be shown to the reader! Also, this particular image is an excellent representation of the theme of the film as a whole, and fits in well with the placement of other film images in their associated sections in the SK article. Does Damiens intend to FFD all the other film images used in this way? Shirtwaist ^chat 07:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In sum of my points, multiple motifs & devices (both verbal and visual) of the story are shown simultaneously in this one photo, making this picture a thematic and plotwise synopsis of the first half of the film as a whole.--WickerGuy (talk) 14:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And SW is right, the picture illustrates Kubrick's subtlety in a way that prose does less well.--WickerGuy (talk) 14:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete The image does not illustrate the information captioned and the caption is FAR too long. It does not have context to prose and the article will NOT suffer from it's deletion or exclusion. Summary information is missing and NO Fair Use rational provided.--Amadscientist (talk) 03:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image does not violate any of the CSD criteria (files) for speedy delete. Shirtwaist ^chat 12:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per Shirtwaist and WickerGuy — BQZip01 — ^talk 18:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The image is does not illustrate anything in an encyclopedic manner. Not all readers will be cinematographers, directors or even film buffs. The image must not be simply illustrative, but must show precisely what the article discusses. This does not. It is merely an image from the film. As such it fails MOS as do almost every image on the Stanley Kubrick article. Fair Use image should be speedy deleted as it fails MOS for fair use rational. The boiler plate information is not enough to sustain the image on a Wikipedia GA or FA article. Images alone will hold the article back. I am unclear why a debate is un-going for a non-compliant fair use image. Regardless of it's worth or value to the article, or whether or not it has context to prose...it is a copyright violation as uploaded. It requires a full rational which is missing. Sadly, regardless of outcome of this debate, the image can still be deleted if these issues are not addressed.--Amadscientist (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply. What exactly does Amadscientist mean by a 'full' rationale? There's a short sketchy rationale on the image page, which could afford to be expanded, but it isn't at all 'boilerplate'. He is perhaps correct that the caption is too long, but to say the "image does not illustrate the information captioned" is just blatantly false!! We could add a bit about chess to the main article text, but the censorship issues are discussed in the body of the article. BTW, that's "rationalE" with an 'E'- that's "ON-going" non "un-going"- that would be "as does" not "as do".--WickerGuy (talk) 12:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I feel this image added substantially to the article. FunkyDuffy (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per Amadscientist's comments and the nominators rationale. Off2riorob (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Image satisfies all NFCC criteria, including NFCC#8, in that it illustrates significant interpretation of the film represented in accompanying text, and adds significantly to the reader's understanding of the topic. Shirtwaist ^chat 10:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I hope I get to vote in addition to making comments here and there, unless as the original uploader I have conflict of interest. So per my earlier copious comments, "keep" unless there is a rule that as original uploader I'm not allowed to vote here.--WickerGuy (talk) 19:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per lack of contextual significance. Whenever possible, we should have descriptive text instead of a non-free image. The caption below the screenshot, "Here (in a scene not in the source novel), as Humbert plays chess with Lolita's mother, he says 'I take your Queen' while Lolita kisses stepfather Humbert goodnight," the scene is easily imagined by readers. Non-free screenshots should be used when it is hard for a reader to comprehend the context without a visual aid. For example, Changeling (film)#Closing sequence talks a lot about the closing sequence and its various elements, and it helps for readers to see a shot from the sequence. In contrast, this is a relatively simple scene to describe without using a copyrighted image. The film Lolita surely has extensive critical analysis behind it, and if the article itself is better developed, then we could see where a particular screenshot could be included to help a reader comprehend a critic's analysis of a given scene. (Is there a reason why the screenshot is even used at Stanley Kubrick and not Lolita (1962 film) anyway?) Erik (talk | contribs) 14:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment That's the best argument for deletion I've seen (similar to the briefer one by Damians.rf), and yes the image doesn't quite have enough contextual significance in the article (though it has some- Read further). A general issue with the Stanley Kubrick article is that most of the discussion of specific films is embedded in the biography (this format had been established long before I got involved with it), and so biography, film plot, and critical significance of films are all merged into one narrative. Many books on Kubrick follow this same pattern, and I suspect that is because Kubrick's style evolved and changed drastically over the years, much more so than, say, Alfred Hitchcock. (And indeed in books on Hitchcock there is a tendency towards a much cleaner separation of biography and discussion of his body of work.)
  
  The image is present in the article on Stanley Kubrick mainly because an important part of the article is Kubrick's confrontation with censorship issues over this film (he says he would have not made it if he had known how severe the issues would be) and the image is a good illustration of Kubrick's use of indirection- both verbal and visual0 to skirt around censorship issues.
  
  BTW, I have reviewed the footage, and actually what happens is Charlotte says "You're going to take my Queen" and Humbert says "That was my intention".--WickerGuy (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• What does the non-free image accomplish that descriptive text cannot? Discussion about Kubrick and censorship is fine, but my experience is that there should be a compelling case for using a non-free image. With the caption explaining the dialogue, we have to imagine the scene taking place. Seeing the image gives readers a very slight benefit, but I still maintain that the descriptive text is sufficient. There is not coverage about the explicit framing, and the poses of the characters in the shot have been described in text well enough to understand how Kubrick circumvented censors. The meaning is clear without the image. In my experience, non-free images are ideal to use when the context is hard for the layperson to imagine. For example, a comprehensive article about a science fiction film is more likely to have non-free images than a comprehensive article about a drama film because of its unusual elements. In contrast, a drama film will have events that are easy to describe. However, for well-studied drama films, there can exist coverage that dissects a given shot or a given scene, for which a screenshot or a video clip can be used as visual aids, respectively. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, the standard that I myself was applying was that the screenshot effectively synopsizes ("synopsis" means "with one eye" in Greek) a lot of verbiage about the scene saving the reader a modest amount of time and mental work. The verbiage was meant by me as an explanation or supplement to the picture- you apparently think it is an adequate substitute for it. Are you saying the non-free images are better employed explaining special visual effects, rather than pivotal moments in a storyline? I was not aware that this had emerged as a consensus, but due to my own time-constraints I have turned down a long-standing invitation to join Wikiproject Film. There is indeed a remarkable absense of images in the articles on The Godfather (film), of which I could think of some justified ones. On the other hand, there are some fair-use images at Taxi Driver, Annie Hall, and Apocalypse Now that are far less justified than this image from Lolita.--WickerGuy (talk) 21:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• When an article about a film undergoes the featured article candidacy process, the non-free images are closely scrutinized by the reviewers. I suppose as a result, I possess a feature article mentality when it comes to such images. When using a science fiction film as an example, I mean to say that it is easier in general to have such non-free images because designs (costume or production) and visual effects are hard to imagine and because there is coverage frequently about such elements. The featured articles on Star Trek films use some non-free content very well. Drama films, since they do not have unusual design and have no effects, do not have that kind of coverage. Their production and reception sections rarely get into detail about a given shot, probably because a drama film's themes stretch out across a scene or the film itself. I think critical analysis is the coverage that articles about drama films need to warrant non-free images; such analysis often dissect scenes. For example, at Apt Pupil (film)#Sadomasochism, homoeroticism, and homophobia, it says, "The cutting between Bowden and Dussander "corroborates a homoerotic arrangement of images" which visualizes the latent homoeroticism of the scene from the novella. When Dussander speeds up his march and Bowden tells him to stop, the sped-up shot reverse shot 'radically [ruptures] the structure of power', where Bowden loses 'control of his sadistic power over Dussander'." That is from one source, and there is another not used in the article that breaks down that particular scene. If I could extrapolate that dissection and include a video clip, the clip would be very illustrative for readers. In contrast, for something like V for Vendetta (film), there used to be a screenshot in the "The letter V and the number 5" section where you see V holding two knives by their tips to form a "V" shape. You probably just imagined how that looked, so the question is, did we need to have a copyrighted image displaying those knives? I think that articles like Taxi Driver need to be expanded to have critical analysis for which we can determine where non-free content would be most beneficial. We can then see where a scene is particularly well-discussed. For example, I researched The Passion of the Christ today, and I listed relevant references on a sub-page. Surely among these references are analyses that it would truly help to see the relevant scenes. For Lolita, there is much coverage for which visual aids could be used. I actually think video clips are actually better than screenshots for articles about drama films, provided that enough coverage exists, where a screenshot would have to be pretty explicit about the framing and not the elements within (like at American Beauty (film), for example). I just think that this Lolita screenshot is a sliver of how we could illustrate parts of the film with extensive context. (Sorry for the tl;dr.) Erik (talk | contribs) 21:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• You make cogent points, Erik, although I believe you're being a bit too narrow in your view of how much an image (even with supporting text) can contribute to the reader's understanding and appreciation for the subject. But I think a much better solution is to leave the image in, and significantly expand on the "chess game" and censorship motifs alluded to in the analysis in the ref WG provided(while reducing the caption to a brief mention. Although I hadn't really considered the "chess" aspect in the past, after rethinking the film, it seems to me to be nothing but a series of chess games between the various characters. That alone, with supporting text, would justify the image's inclusion, not only here but in the Lolita (1962 film) article too. Shirtwaist ^chat 22:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I have mentioned before, in a discussion about a screenshot of a deleted scene from 2001, how I think it's a bad practice to rewrite the articles to justify the use of non-free images. I specially like Erik's strategy above: that we first write an a very good article based on sources and, once we notice we're dealing with a topic that's difficult to be made understandable by the reader without some imagery, we seek for and add an image that will do the job. The text should determine the images and not the reverse. The discussion about the "difficult topic" would be something that's present elsewhere in the written literature about the film and that made it way into our article naturally, as a relevant topic it is. Rewriting articles around images is not the path to a good article. --damiens.rf 23:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it's really a question of whether the rewrite is to better suit wikipedia policy (especially if we need to restructure text) or new text is something created from scratch to create a rationale for the image. I looked at dozens of images from Lolita before deciding this would be the most likely to be WP:NFCC compliant, as it illustrates Kubrick's subtle dance around censorship issues which were already discussed in the article before the image was added. As such, in this case a rewrite is a WP:good faith effort to accomodate the picture more readily. It's a kind of dialectic progression: Text-->Supporting image-->Better text to better integrate image.--WickerGuy (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Summation of everybody It seems on the one hand that since the purpose of the image is to illustrate why Lolita was such a contentious and controversial movie, the film where Stanley Kubrick face the greatest amount of censorship, and illustrate Kubrick's technique of circumventing censorship its presence in the article is somewhat justified. It goes beyond mere identification of the film.
  However, on the other hand Erik and damiens.rf seem to believe that everything in the image is easily described and visualized in the text, and as such the image is not necessary.--WickerGuy (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picturexx.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davkal ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Random stupidity by a blocked user. No encyclopedic value at all. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ufo barnstar.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davkal ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Watermarks indicate that this is unfree/goes against the terms of use for the morpher. Used in one subpage and one archive (because it's an award). Uploaded by a banned user. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unused and thus being useless. mabdul 01:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me. Dreadstar ☥ 23:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monty.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davkal ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused image illustrating the already well illustrated Monty Hall problem, except that this one uses other images of unknown sources. Uploaded by now banned user. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, low quality and per above. mabdul 17:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:En2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Venny85 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orphaned, can be replaced, if needed by 'math' tex code Skier Dude (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, already replaced and then rest of the series was already deleted last week. mabdul 01:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:En3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Venny85 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orphaned, can be replaced, if needed by 'math' tex code Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, already replaced and then rest of the series was already deleted last week. mabdul 02:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:En4.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Venny85 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orphaned, can be replaced, if needed by 'math' tex code Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, already replaced and then rest of the series was already deleted last week. mabdul 02:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:En1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Venny85 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orphaned, can be replaced, if needed by 'math' tex code Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, already replaced and then rest of the series was already deleted last week. mabdul 02:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amide.GIF (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nuklear ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Comment:although this should be achieved by a better method: The image isn't used ATM although it could be uploaded to commons: I don't see the original purpose: the image (although similar exists, but not exactly describing the chemical process) aren't used in the English and German Wikipedia ATM. mabdul 02:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It is low quality and unused. If such an image needed at a later time, a new high-quality image can be created in minutes via Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AThTP-2D.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lulubou ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badJPG. Leyo 14:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this is a different representation than File:Adenosine thiamine triphosphate.png. This image is an ion. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. --Leyo 10:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. Move to commons as a different representation. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or find an alternative of same molecule diagram and then delete. -Gryllida 10:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  It's bad, it's unused. That's enough. --Leyo 11:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  If you know the standards for drawing molecules, please make a high quality replacement. The image is informative and as such I would not support its deletion - if it's useless here at Wikipedia, a move to Commons would sound more appropriate. -Gryllida 13:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Would you like me to draw a replacement for all the ~1000 orphaned low quality chemical structures? --Leyo 17:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Uh, tag them at least? I'm not very aware of how this works, but they're readable and informative. I'll wait for someone else to have a say here. -Gryllida 22:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  {{Should be SVG|chemical}} is for low quality files that are non-orphaned. --Leyo 00:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, we are talking about an old, orphaned picture of a rare chemical compound, and about a picture which won't be used. To claim that it represents the ion is not sufficient for two reasons: a) Adenosine thiamine triphosphate.png is also an ion, b) whether three oxygens atoms are anions or four (or howmany ever) depends on the pH, but this is not indicated. So according to that logic we'd have to upload many more pictures of that compound which is ridicolous. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't see the problem with multiple representations on commons. It's the current state of affairs with maps on Commons, so why shouldn't there be a variety for chemical images? 65.94.47.63 (talk) 03:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It is low quality and unused. If such an image needed at a later time, a new high-quality image can be created in minutes via Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Low-quality as it stands, easily creatable at higher quality in whatever ionic form, level of detail, and conformation is needed in the future. But pointless to generate dozens of possibilities for arbitrary chemicals just for the sake of having them. Because it's so easy to create these diagrams, many editors seem to just draw them from scratch when needed without bothering to check commons, so we wind up having a ton of duplicates and low-quality ones there anyway.DMacks (talk) 15:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bartondecarbtotal.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zacaris15 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTfensine.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nuklear ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment why is this image worse than File:BTfensine.GIF ? 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  They both do not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing. Only the nominated one is orphaned yet. --Leyo 10:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Why not nominate both of them? They're both badly named, since they share the same name with different capitalization... 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. What meaning do those colorful circles have? They are distracting and not educational. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flagyl.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lewisbasic ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fuchsine.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by V8rik ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atropine.GIF (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nuklear ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• move to commons and rename since it's not just atropine. it's a comparison image. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. There are way better images of all three compounds. --Leyo 10:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. Point out an image that does this job and I'll withdraw my MTC. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. There is no benefit in comparison the use i. e. three single images. The fact that this picture is orphaned demonstrates my argument. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aziridinemechanism.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by V8rik ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burimamide.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjah-bmm27 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carbofuran.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fiveless ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decadienal.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Krefts ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diaryl.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nuklear ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diborane.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjah-bmm27 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the author. Go ahead and delete, there are plenty of newer, better high-resolution PNG images of this molecule. --Ben (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dihydrotestosterone.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nathanael Bar-Aur L. ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diphenylalanine.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jeremiah ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dmm.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SethGarrett ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eflornithine.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GeeJo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethosuximide.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GeeJo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free Radical Halogenation Initiation.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thelope916 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to commons as file:free radical halogenation initiation of dichlorine.gif - this is better than the image currently used. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  It was replaced in Free radical halogenation by a way better image. --Leyo 10:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I withdraw my MTC. I was looking at a different article, it had a poorer image. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GaMaltolate.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gallium31 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genericesterification.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lelio Rising ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GlcNAc.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by THuhn ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heptalene.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fiveless ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydroboration2.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tomba ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrogenation.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Schizmatic ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to commons as file:hydrogenation of ethene.gif . 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  No, the image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. There are better alternatives on Commons. --Leyo 10:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. Point out the better alternatives and I'll withdraw my MTC. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Withdrawn per Yikrazuul finding one. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 03:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, and besides, on commons we already have the duplicate Alkene to alkane.png. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indole3carbinol.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Settersr ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indatraline.GIF (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nuklear ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to commons colorful, highlights aromicity. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. --Leyo 10:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The standard for de.wikipedia is virtually the same. BTW: The structure above was replaced by File:Indatraline.png by the same user. --Leyo 00:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  de.wiki is also not every wikipedia. As for the replacement by the same user, the GIF image still highlights aromicity, while the PNG does not. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 05:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, donna know what those red circles and yellow whatever are, but per Leyo. We have now Indatraline.png. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isoguanine.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Squidonius ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maleicanhydride.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Quadalpha ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maltose.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Meandmyself ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• move to commons this image shows one more carbon/CH2 link than Isomaltose.svg and two more than Maltose Haworth.svg , so it is different. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. There are several better alternatives on Commons. --Leyo 10:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. Point out an alternative with this structure, and I'll withdraw my MTC. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, better alternatives in Category:Maltose, not used and bad quality. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MethaneCombustion2.GIF (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Steves1989 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced by TeX code. Leyo 14:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metiamide.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjah-bmm27 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modafinil Hybrid.GIF (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nuklear ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to commons license is compatible. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  License is not an issue here. The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. --Leyo 10:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, whatever that is, I have found no CAS-number and PubChem entry, could be an hoax. Not used + bad quality + questionalbe structure...--Yikrazuul (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicergoline structure.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nh8192 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badGIF. Leyo 14:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrogen and oxygen react to form water.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theislikerice ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Bad duplicate of File:Hydrogen and oxygen react to form water.png. Leyo 14:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lactideedit.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wahooligan86 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused low-resolution poor file-format (replaceable by commons:File:Lactide.png) DMacks (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per nom. --Leyo 20:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polydimethylsiloxane.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wahooligan86 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused low-resolution poor file-format (replaceable by commons:File:Pdms.png among others) DMacks (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per nom. --Leyo 20:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment they're both ugly, but the JPG seems clearer (reprsentationally) than the PNG. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• move to commons 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. Move it to Commons and I will delete it there. ;-) --Leyo 10:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. The alternate image is uglier, this is clearer in representation, even though it has compression artifacts. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  This file clearly fails de.wiki standard for example. There are several alternatives in Commons:Category:Polydimethylsiloxane. --Leyo 00:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  It would be nice if File:Dimethylpolysiloxan.png were formatted in the same manner (middle of a polymer, instead of a methylated-hydrogenated dimer only, a second image made from that would be clear. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, bad quality, and superceded by other pictures, e. g. like PDMS.svg, so no benefit. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schomburg.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 1027E ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schomburg.pdf Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trans vs. Cis Fatty Acids.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wahooligan86 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused low-resolution poor file-format (replaceable by commons:File:Elaidic-acid-2D-skeletal.png) DMacks (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per nom. --Leyo 20:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I fail to see how it is replaceable by the second image, since that image only is half of the image nominated. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The image does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing at all. --Leyo 10:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  That's an en.wiki standard, not an every wikipedia standard. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  An image was found that illustrates this point better, per Yikrazuul. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 03:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, and superceded by the commons picture Isomers of oleic acid.png. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narendra Modi.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rajeevpathak ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The uploader claims to be an admin of one of the three websites that this image has been uploaded to, no OTRS or verfication on that count. —SpacemanSpiff 18:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• ehm, delete. CSD? mabdul 17:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narendra Modi with Anil Ambani.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rajeevpathak ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

See above listing. —SpacemanSpiff 18:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per above (alt: csd). mabdul 17:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suppes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wahooligan86 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned/replaced, low quality, badJPG. Leyo 20:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per name, it's backwards (Green chemistry talks about Suppes converting glycerin into propylene glycol, not the other way around). DMacks (talk) 23:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BigGovernmentcom Weinergate screenshot.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheCuriousGnome ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free website screenshot being used just to make the point that the website covered a given topic. damiens.rf 21:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails wikipedia fair use. Everyone knows what a website looks like, you don't need someone else's copyrighted picture to show people. Off2riorob (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NFC#8. A description of the BigGovernment.com posted article is enough to suffice its content; a screenshot of the article is unnecessary for a reader to understand its context.
• Keep. As someone who has followed this controversy, I can tell you that the screenshot conveys important information not (yet) discussed in the article (nor at Andrew Breitbart). I think it likely that we will want to use this or a similar image within a week or two; best to keep this. CWC 04:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it adds nothing to the article that a link or text description couldn't accomplish. --B (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, there are 3—5 articles where we could/should mention an issue for which this screenshot would be a perfect, and almost necessary, accompaniment, with at least 2 more likely within a few weeks. (I'm omitting details per a strong interpretation of WP:BLP. For more info, email me.) Cheers, CWC 11:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • So save it on your local memory and re upload it then, Off2riorob (talk) 23:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is not a graphical image. It's just rendered text in a web browser. What is the point?--RaptorHunter (talk) 23:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Err ... no, not "just rendered text". For details, email me. CWC 03:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • How about no?--RaptorHunter (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unused, orphaned, copyrighted image. mabdul 17:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vitamina.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chemist223 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Vitamin A - I think not. A very poor rendition of Icosane  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. s/poor/incorrect/. There are "h" (I assume that means "H") attached to the center of C–C bonds too. DMacks (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Poorly descriptive image; looks like it was created in a word processor. Does not meet the standards listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basketball Moscow 1980.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cmapm ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low-quality fair-use file that did not really add anything to the article, could be replaced with File:Basketball pictogram.svg §§§§ Alquerytalk 00:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.