The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirects are cheap. Johnleemk | Talk 07:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly named, duplicate article. Plenty O'Toole already exists and redirects to Lana Wood, but in the history there is an expanded version of the text in this article. If anyone thinks this is worth an article, they can use that. - N (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I have restored the version at Plenty O'Toole so you can compare. - N (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My advice is to withdraw this nomination, point this one to the new Plenty content, and voila. Endomion 00:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the easy thing to do ;-) Given the name, I don't think this article is even useful as a redirect, so I'll let the AfD run to see if we can get it deleted if possible. If not, I'll redirect to the correctly named article when we're done. - N (talk) 00:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Wikipedia does not usually direct articles on fictional characters to the person who plays them on TV. In fact, the other redirect should point to this article so people looking for Plenty get Plenty and people looking for Lana get Lana. Endomion 23:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would it not be sensible to just use the text in the history of the Plenty O'Toole article and delete this? Nobody is going to accidentally type in "(I)" and nothing links to this article. - N (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, she's a Bond girl. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not disputing the content of the article. The article is named Plenty O'Toole (I). We already have an article at Plenty O'Toole, but at this time, it redirects to the actor. If you look in the history of that article, it contains more or less the text here and then some, so if somebody would like to expand on that, then they can use the correctly named article we already have. - N (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Duplicate article, inferior version to Plenty O'Toole. Would say redirect, but is anybody ever going to type that in to the serachbox? -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 00:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (or redirect, hardly matters), and give a hell of a cleanup to Plenty O'Toole. Awful article, as it stands. -R. fiend 04:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because nobody is ever going to type this in the searchbox. Stifle 11:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - duplicate article, useless redirect. (Looks like someone got this place mixed up with the IMDb). 23skidoo 15:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.