The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corfe Mullen United F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

club is playing in a level 12 league (Dorset Senior League) - not high enough to be notable. ⇒ Chris0282 (talk) 06:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - regarding teams, WP:NSPORTS specifically does not cover teams, suggesting WP:GNG is their guideline. WP:FOOTYN is a project essay on the issue - it merely suggests non-national teams must meet broader notability requirements (usually meaning GNG).

There certainly may well not be sufficient sourcing to make the article notable, but football team ranking (in and of itself) is not a direct bar to notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of FA Cup participation or anything that satisfies the broader requirements of GNG. Nzd (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails GNG and FOOTYN, since it hasn't appeared in the FA Cup or been at a high enough level in the pyramid to do so. Smartyllama (talk) 14:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Corfe Mullen per WP:ATD-M. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, I am also against any merge, Govvy (talk) 20:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? a redirect would be useful and avoid breaking links to the page. It could even just be mentioned at Corfe Mullen#Facilities without causing problems. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.