Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Page needs to be protected since the author has moved it several times, and also considering that it is being discussed at AfD. CycloneYoris talk! 09:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated IP edits to introduce unwarranted doubt over reliably sourced health condition of subject (Alzheimer’s) U-Mos (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator BusterD. Favonian (talk) 12:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Permanent semi-protection: Contentious topic sanctioned under, WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Ecrusized (talk) 12:18, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Permanent semi-protection: Contentious topic sanctioned under, WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Ecrusized (talk) 12:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Frequent vandalism by IPs and new profiles Polish kurd (talk) 12:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unsourced/fake cast and crew details, a lot of it coming from User:Bigboss19923 evading a block. Belbury (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. WP:GS/CRYPTO RaschenTechner (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of vandalism including blanking the page and replacing it with messages claiming Elon Musk or Donald Trump is a Nazi. Even extended-confirmed users are vandalizing this article. Please set this page protection level to fully protected. Evrstz (talk) 16:18, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Evrstz: The only person I see doing that has been glocked as a sockpuppet of a long-term abuser. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ok, understood. Evrstz (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined No reason to fully protect the article. Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism it's lio! | talk | work 16:28, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: Page protection is now 14 years old and refers to the repeated creation of an article about a non-notable DJ from Tampa—a notable rapper from Philadelphia shares this name. Admin who protected the page is no longer an admin. benǝʇᴉɯ 22:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I should also note that it's more than possible that WP:ACPERM and the availability of XCP as an option for creation protection both make the full creation protection irrelevant/not as needed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... unregistered users must be use edit request and to make edit notice to prevent put phone numbers 2001:44C8:4245:EA3:E156:F27B:9DA5:6B8C (talk) 09:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Given the main reason the page was protected was because people were posting phone numbers - information which is suppressable on discovery - protection rather than an edit notice would serve much better. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:14, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    No tags for this post.