User talk:Yuzy Okkotsu1

Welcome!

Hi Yuzy Okkotsu1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Explaining: no, I didn't see your contributions (as the template for welcoming says), but I saw your wish to be welcomed. Nice to meet you, and good to see you contributing! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aung Zaw Thein has been accepted

Aung Zaw Thein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aung Ko (ambassador) has been accepted

Aung Ko (ambassador), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AstrooKai (Talk) 06:19, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laila Khan (actress) (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please share reliable sources that cover her career significantly and if any of the roles the subject were notable and received coverage in media outlet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 13:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

Information icon - Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Ananya Panday, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry.I did it without knowing. Yuzy (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm RachelTensions. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Information such as height and weight don't belong in the infobox unless they are relevant to their notability (ie. athletes or models, not not singers/actors). Parents/relatives/siblings do not get added to the infobox unless they are notable in their own right and have a Wikipedia article to link to. All information must be sourced. RachelTensions (talk) 11:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RachelTensions. Thanks for the message and for taking the time to review my edit. I understand and appreciate the importance of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. I included that information in good faith, but I see now that it may not have met the necessary criteria for inclusion, particularly regarding verifiability and notability. I’ll make sure to provide reliable sources in future edits and to be more mindful of what’s appropriate for infoboxes. Thanks again for your guidance.Yuzy (talk) 12:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soe Pyae Thazin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burmese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Yuzy Okkotsu1, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that in the short time you have been editing you have created quite a number of women's biographies. We look forward to many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look at the guidance in our Ten Simple Rules- Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipigott, Thank you for the warm welcome! I’m happy to be part of Women in Red and will definitely keep contributing. I’ll be sure to reach out if I need any help. Best, Yuzy Okkotsu1 (☎) 10:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twante Soe Aung has been accepted

Twante Soe Aung, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Imwin567 (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Welcome and happy editing.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

Hi there, why remove my usertalkpage link from Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2025/Participants and this a diff of you're revert my usertalkpage link from there, I'm also NPP, so, I have full ability to participating in NPP/May/backlog2025. --Regards,  KB~Abhiimanyu7  talk  03:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I accidentally removed my own user talk page link from the Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2025/Participants page. I'm an active New Page Patroller and fully eligible to participate in the May 2025 backlog drive. I'll be more careful to avoid this kind of mistake in the future. Apologies for any confusion caused. Yuzy (talk) 03:40, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuzy Okkotsu1 you also reverted my removal. Do not do it again. Also you are not a New Page Reviewer, neither I. So do not add your user talk page there. Also please revert your edits you made in there. Imwin567 (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for the mistake.Yuzy (talk) 03:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:GMMTV Artists

Template:GMMTV Artists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338


Online events:

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
    are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains multiple syntax errors, specifically: formatting tags that are in the wrong order, a time stamp, an extra link to your talk page, and an extra link to your User page.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
  3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:

[[User:Yuzy Okkotsu1| [[User:Yuzy Okkotsu1|<sup><span style="color:blue;">'''Yuzy Okkotsu1'''</span>]]</sup> ([[User talk: Yuzy Okkotsu1|☎]]) 13:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)]] ([[User talk:Yuzy Okkotsu1|talk]])

Fixed signature:

[[User:Yuzy Okkotsu1|<sup><span style="color:blue;">'''Yuzy Okkotsu1'''</span></sup>]] ([[User talk: Yuzy Okkotsu1|☎]])

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message on this page, or at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jonesey95, Thank you so much for your support and guidance! I truly appreciate your help in resolving the custom signature issue. Your clear explanation made it much easier for me to fix everything, and now it’s working perfectly. Thanks again for taking the time to assist me. Best regards,Yuzy Okkotsu1 (☎) 00:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That looks great! Nice work. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Assi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Christina Assi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cinder painter (talk) 07:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ticket to Heaven (Thai TV series)

Hello Yuzy Okkotsu1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ticket to Heaven (Thai TV series) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Ticket to Heaven (Thai TV series) to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

AstrooKai (Talk) 10:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Assi (journalist) has been accepted

Christina Assi (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 12:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple posts

I see that you have posted this message to the talk pages of 6 people, askkng for help. That is generally not considered to be a good idea, for several reasons, including the fact that it risks leading editors to put time into duplicating work which has already been done by someone else. JBW (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice, JBW. I understand now that posting the same request to multiple users’ talk pages may not be the best approach, as it can lead to unnecessary duplication of effort. I appreciate your guidance and will make sure to be more careful in the future when seeking help from editors. My intention was just to ensure the article would get timely attention, but I now see how it might have caused confusion. Thanks again! Yuzy Okkotsu1 (☎) 10:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AungKaung932 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AungKaung932. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yuzy Okkotsu1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am requesting an unblock for my account User:Yuzy Okkotsu1. I believe I was mistakenly blocked as a sockpuppet of another user. I am not related to the account I was accused of being connected to. I have never engaged in sockpuppetry and I am willing to cooperate fully to resolve any confusion. Please consider reviewing my case again. Thank you.

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yuzy Okkotsu1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I respectfully request an unblock for my account User:Yuzy Okkotsu1. I understand that I was blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of User:AungKaung932, as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AungKaung932.

However, I sincerely state that I am not related to that user in any way. I have never operated multiple accounts or engaged in sockpuppetry. I am willing to fully cooperate with any technical checks or CheckUser review to verify this. If there was overlapping content, it was purely coincidental.

I respectfully ask for a re-evaluation of my case, and I promise to strictly follow Wikipedia’s policies and editing guidelines going forward. Thank you for considering my request.

— User:Yuzy Okkotsu1

Decline reason:

My use of the CheckUser tool indicates you share an IP address with Aung Thu Ra Phyo2006. In this context, I think it is likely you are a sock puppet. PhilKnight (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yuzy Okkotsu1 (☎) 16:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2025

Women in Red | June 2025, Vol 11, Issue 6, Nos. 326, 327, 339, 340


Online events:

Announcements:

  • Who are the most overlooked and interesting Women in Red? We've no idea,
    but we're putting together our list of the 100 most interesting ex-Women in Red.
    We are creating the list to celebrate 10 years of Women in Red and we hope to present it at Wikimania.
    We are ignoring the obvious, so do you have a name or subject we should consider?
    Can you suggest a DYK style hook?
    If you are shy about editing that page, you are welcome to add ideas and comments on the talk page.
  • The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July, 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,492 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% (2,061,363 bios; 414,126 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Every language Wikipedia has its own policies regarding notability and reliable sources.
    Before translating an article from one language Wikipedia into English Wikipedia, research
    the subject and verify that the translated article will meet English Wikipedia's policy requirements.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red July 2025

Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343


Online events:

Announcements:

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
  • 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

  • A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
    but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2025

Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:56, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - December 2025

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - January 2026

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red February 2026

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia
    articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet.

Tip of the month:

  • Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - March 2026

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays,
    perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yuzy_Okkotsu1