Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Romania you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 05:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Romania you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Romania for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Salvation Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you remove some sources from the lead at Romania - the leads do not need to have sources... However the sources should be in the article where the statement appears again see WP:Burden. Just need to move the statement or the sources to the body of the article. Our purpose is to facilitate research by way of providing sources. We make this as easy as possible not making a reader's have to do a run around to other articles hoping they are source properly. This will be requirement for any GA review...... that is statements within the article are source within the article. Moxy🍁 22:57, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the sources specifically from the Tourism in Romania and the classification of Romania as a middle power since they are already present on these articles and redundant in the lead Vellutis (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources need to be in the article where the statement appears. ..... All you have to do is simply move them to the body. ...... Just regurgitate the lead.... is a middle power (source here). Please do not make our readers search other articles for sources that may or may not be there or may or may not be reliable if they are there. You're risking people adding non-verification tags for something that was previously sourced. See WP:Purpose. Moxy🍁 23:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but since most EU countries are classified as middle powers in international relations, I felt that sourcing this in the lead was redundant. I've added supporting sources to the Foreign relations of Romania article.

Thanks for your attention, I really appreciate it. Vellutis (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]