Sockpuppettry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Somebody23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account exists for more than fifteen years, so it cannot be a sockpuppet of whatever account it is implied to be a sockpuppet of. I understand that a Wikipedia editor who removed, for no apparent reason, a significant part of an article several weeks ago feels hurt about the explanation I provided that it is actual part of an entry, sourced and amassed over several years that he can't just delete, so this is their attempt at removing my ability to edit Wikipedia. Thus, I submit this request to unblock me and actually check out people who destroy the credibility of Wikipedia by removing huge chunks of entries without reason.Somebody23 (talk) 11:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My account exists for more than fifteen years, so it cannot be a sockpuppet of whatever account it is implied to be a sockpuppet of. I understand that a Wikipedia editor who removed, for no apparent reason, a significant part of an article several weeks ago feels hurt about the explanation I provided that it is actual part of an entry, sourced and amassed over several years that he can't just delete, so this is their attempt at removing my ability to edit Wikipedia. Thus, I submit this request to unblock me and actually check out people who destroy the credibility of Wikipedia by removing huge chunks of entries without reason.[[User:Somebody23|Somebody23]] ([[User talk:Somebody23#top|talk]]) 11:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My account exists for more than fifteen years, so it cannot be a sockpuppet of whatever account it is implied to be a sockpuppet of. I understand that a Wikipedia editor who removed, for no apparent reason, a significant part of an article several weeks ago feels hurt about the explanation I provided that it is actual part of an entry, sourced and amassed over several years that he can't just delete, so this is their attempt at removing my ability to edit Wikipedia. Thus, I submit this request to unblock me and actually check out people who destroy the credibility of Wikipedia by removing huge chunks of entries without reason.[[User:Somebody23|Somebody23]] ([[User talk:Somebody23#top|talk]]) 11:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My account exists for more than fifteen years, so it cannot be a sockpuppet of whatever account it is implied to be a sockpuppet of. I understand that a Wikipedia editor who removed, for no apparent reason, a significant part of an article several weeks ago feels hurt about the explanation I provided that it is actual part of an entry, sourced and amassed over several years that he can't just delete, so this is their attempt at removing my ability to edit Wikipedia. Thus, I submit this request to unblock me and actually check out people who destroy the credibility of Wikipedia by removing huge chunks of entries without reason.[[User:Somebody23|Somebody23]] ([[User talk:Somebody23#top|talk]]) 11:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Technical data shows the connection is  Possible in this case. I'm afraid I can't do better than that. The reviewing admin will need to review behavioural evidence. --Yamla (talk) 12:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user triggered an edit filter trying to make the same edits as the tagged sockmaster as well as this account; blocked per WP:DUCK. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Somebody23
No tags for this post.