Please do not add or change content, as you did at Abdul Qadir Raipuri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000 the sources are reliable brother, I may check the sources again at your convenience but I just want to make content more reliable to get more information for both of them and this information is from their own books Proactive M3 (talk) 23:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000 I also give reference which are reliable and also give name of some books written upon him or written by him. Proactive M3 (talk) 23:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000 I want you to update the given information of Abdul Qadir Raipuri because it was by reliable resources brother . I am very grateful to you for this act of kindness. Wasalam Brother . Proactive M3 (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dl2000 References are gain From مشائخ رائے پور اور برصغیر میں تجدید دین کی روداد Available on www.rahimia.org.com Proactive M3 (talk) 00:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

www.rahimia.org Proactive M3 (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Abdul Qadir Raipuri, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Saeed Ahmed Raipuri, you may be blocked from editing. Patient Zero^talk 00:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Patient Zero what should I do Proactive M3 (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Abdul Qadir Raipuri. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 01:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Padgriffin I removed it on your convince Thanks for your help . Proactive M3 (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to to the world this and other best sides of him with the help of refrences Proactive M3 (talk) 01:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Padgriffin Sir it doesn't a spam link Proactive M3 (talk) 01:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 what's the problem Proactive M3 (talk) 02:03, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Proactive M3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't provide false information about him and sorry for any misunderstanding

Decline reason:

I'm declining your unblock request, because it doesn't in any way address the reasons for your block. Besides which, you have been blocked for sockpuppetry, and we don't unblock sock accounts. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proactive M3 (talk) 02:19, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you requested a courtesy vanishing and yet have returned to the same problematic editing patterns. As such, you have been blocked per our sockpuppetry policy. Patient Zero^talk 02:23, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Patient Zero but I couldn't do it brother Proactive M3 (talk) 02:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Patient Zero but for your understanding to me I cannot write or regenerate any information on Them now Proactive M3 (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me sir Proactive M3 (talk) 02:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin - I do not possess the ability to block or unblock users. However, I can certainly say there is a good reason you have been blocked. Any unblock request you make needs to show that you understand the consequences of your actions here. One other thing I will say here (and please don't take any offence) is that, unfortunately, I am struggling to understand some of your messages, and I get the impression that English is perhaps not your first language. If you could take an intermediate English course of some kind for the next six months or so (Duolingo is good for this), as well as acknowledge everything I have said above, then you may stand a chance of being welcomed back into the community. Patient Zero^talk 02:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Proactive M3, please stop pinging other editors unnecessarily. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]