Hi there, could you explain a revert reason in Academy Awards. The Polar Music Prize also using international/world some key words. It's make more clear for who the award for. Why I can't using these words in there? Thanks. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevencocoboy You have made 6 changes to the article in the last couple of days, changing the awarded_for field to several different versions:

• Excellence in the worldwide film industry
• Excellence film industry in the world
• Excellence in the world of film industry

The last two are grammatically incorrect English and make no sense, which is why I reverted them. I did not revert the first one, but it was reverted by two other editors (User:Rhain and User:Chousic), for reasons they explained in their edit summaries. I agree with them that the word "worldwide" is unnecessary. It is generally not used in sources. Since your change is opposed by multiple editors, you should open a discussion on the article talk page and present sources that support the change you want to make. CodeTalker (talk) 02:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've open a new topic in Talk:Academy Awards. Unnecessary is feeling but I disagree. This is a key word to label who the award for, for american only or around the world. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you removed the content I added to One taste. I’ve provided evidence on the article’s talk page to address any concerns. Please take a look when you have time.

Thank you Jackersony (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello CodeTalker Thank you for clarification. please take a look my correction when you have a time. Jackersony (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Code Talker, You indicated that edits from 12/24 were removed from the article regarding myself because of a lack of citation. I am the subject of the article and corrected the mis-statements and added an update. Tell me what you need, since the corrections addressed statements like the mis-identification of the law school I attended and the duration of my service as Mayor and the addition of my new term on City Council which began in 2023. I would like to get some additional direction as to what is needed. 73.145.149.79 (talk) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@73.145.149.79: Hi, thanks for asking. Per Wikipedia policies, you must provide published sources, such as newspapers, magazines or books, that supports the information that you want to add or change. You own knowledge of the information is not sufficient, since other readers must be able to verify everything in Wikipedia. See WP:V for the policy, and WP:REFBEGIN for an introduction on how to provide references to sources. Also, Wikipedia's policy is to not name children or other relatives of the subject of an article unless those relatives are independently notable. This is to protect their privacy; see WP:BLPNAME. Let me know if you have any other questions, and I would be happy to help with the technical details after you locate appropriate sources. CodeTalker (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus and the woman taken in adultery

You're the second person to revert my addition to that page today.

I have since started a Talk page section after someone else undid my addition the first time.

To substantiate my addition, I cited the published source for James Snapp's work, and I did not voice my own opinions.

What's going on here? DFH (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained the reason for my revert in the talk page section that you started. Others have also commented there now. Please continue the discussion there, and for your own sake, do not continue to edit war the material into the article until the talk page discussion reaches consensus. CodeTalker (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! 23r2 here. I realised that you reverted some edits/moves I made to the Kuril Archipelago. The reason I did this is the fact that yes, it is a group of islands, however, it is also an archipelago. It is recognised by 47 countries worldwide as the Kuril Archipelago, rather than the Kuril Islands. These countries include 97% of English speaking countries, such as the USA and UK. This is because they use the ICNRNRA (International Country, Nation and Region Name Recognition Association) as a reference point for names. E.g, on Google Maps, it is labelled as the Kuril Archipelago, rather than the Kuril Islands. The Japanese native name also translates directly to 'People's archipelago of a thousand islands". A country/region can also, by the rules posed by the ICNRNRA, not contain the country's/region's land/terrain type, hence why the Bahamas aren't called 'The Bahama's Islands' but rather 'The Bahamas'. However, a country/region is permitted to have a name aligning with the country's RTCT (Recognised Totalled Country (or region) Type), meaning it would be an archipelago, via international laws. A name can also not be plural in land type/RTCT, making it impossible for it to be called the Kuril Islands, meaning it would rather have to be the Kuril Island, which makes it seem like the archipelago is just one island, rather than 56.

Thanks, 23r2 23r2 (talk) 22:50, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]