![]() |
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you. User:Mao Martin |
|
|
![]() |
---|
27 February 2025 |
|
July 2015

Mao Martin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I agree that this a sockpuppet. But I agree to abide by the wikipedia policy on multiple accounts and make necessary changes in my User page and also this user page confirming that Mao Martin is a alternative account of M.srihariMao Martin (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
To start with, please request an unblock with your original account, not the sock you used to evade your block. Kuru (talk) 22:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- First, you have no legitimate basis for having an alternate account. Second, you will never be unblocked if you continue to sock. See 117.201.42.194 (talk · contribs · count).--Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Please enlighten me on that "legitimate" reason. And, I agreed to surrender after that 117.201.42.194 incident.Mao Martin (talk) 16:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Kuru: I have made my unblock request in my original talk page as per your suggestion.Mao Martin (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.