Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcello Tonelli (nephrologist) (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lightonitsfeet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marcello Tonelli (nephrologist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marcello Tonelli (nephrologist). Thanks! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for the comment. I am not skilled with this process, nor with the formatting.
I used an LLM to help with formatting and not to generate content. I believe that none of the cited issues with LLM apply to this draft: I have tried to be factual, cite all sources, avoid promotional language etc. I have disclosed my COI. I understand that I am not objective and I think that the draft is ready for an independent review. Should I disclose my COI on the talk page for the article also? Or is the disclosure on my user page sufficient? Thank you for your help. Lightonitsfeet (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lightonitsfeet
No tags for this post.