Hello, Kakeithewolf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 00:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How about you start by NOT trying to delete the Biwako page? I seriously can't help the fact Mozambique has had heavy floods in past years, and it is impossible to recover the data, as the only site it was on went dead YEARS ago.

Look, it's hard to work with this when my hands are tied. Sharpe wasn't exactly the glowing pillar of fame, as crpytoornithology isn't all that much of scientific interest.

Just understand this. I can't get the data now, and Sharpe is dead and in more obscured a grave than Jean-Valjean could aspire to. This page is about all the memorial the man will ever get, and it deserves to be seen so that his work was not in vain. Kakeithewolf (talk) 02:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The unsourced article about this so-called bird was deleted pursuant to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mozambican Biwako. Do not try to reinstate it by changing this redirect. You'll be blocked. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 00:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If, as you claimed in the AFD discussion, you need more time to locate sources, feel free to keep a copy of the article in your sandbox or sub-page off your user page, or in draft space, where you can work on it at your leisure without worrying about it being deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Biwako shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnInDC (talk) 00:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:R, the redirect page for Lake Biwa should be deleted, replacing the replace header with this

Add if you prefer.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.