![]() | This user page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Request for Review of Draft: The Frost (2024 film)
Hi, I am Josh Rubin, the creator of *The Frost*, and I have a Conflict of Interest (COI) in relation to this article. I am providing a draft for review by neutral editors to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards for notability, neutrality, and reliable sourcing.
Here is the draft in my sandbox: User:JRubinFilm/sandbox
I would greatly appreciate any feedback from editors on whether this draft is suitable for Wikipedia and suggestions on how to improve its compliance with Wikipedia’s guidelines.
Thank you,
Josh Rubin JRubinFilm (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
AFC discussion
Comment: Note: author came onto #wikipedia-en-help. The draft was rejected and CSD'd by @User:Bobby Cohn which I thought was a little hasty. I have undone the rejection and CSD in good faith that the author can work on this sandbox. I have given advice on declaring a conflict of interest and writing suitably for Wikipedia. qcne (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Qcne, responding here as a courtesy to let you know. I've restored my AFC rejection but I've left the submission template above it: I'm okay with the disagreement and your endorsing of the continued work in the draft space, but it's fine to leave my rejection as a part of the AFC history. If you (or others) believe it was hasty that's fine (I'll bear the responsibility as its got my name on it and AFC reviewers are tasked with answering to their decisions), although my view is that it was submitted, and that is inherently asking for it to be reviewed by other editors. To that end, I've tagged the most egregious sections in the end and there are additional problems (in my opinion) in the same vein in the reception section. Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks @Bobby Cohn, that all makes sense. qcne (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Qcne, responding here as a courtesy to let you know. I've restored my AFC rejection but I've left the submission template above it: I'm okay with the disagreement and your endorsing of the continued work in the draft space, but it's fine to leave my rejection as a part of the AFC history. If you (or others) believe it was hasty that's fine (I'll bear the responsibility as its got my name on it and AFC reviewers are tasked with answering to their decisions), although my view is that it was submitted, and that is inherently asking for it to be reviewed by other editors. To that end, I've tagged the most egregious sections in the end and there are additional problems (in my opinion) in the same vein in the reception section. Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.