- Archive 1 - 17 July 05 to 22 Oct 06
- Archive 2 - 24 Oct 06 to 26 Feb 07
- Archive 3 - 28 Feb 07 to 21 June 07
- Archive 4 - 25 June 07 to 1 Aug 07
- Archive 5 - 6 Aug 07 to 2 Oct 07
- Archive 6 - 2 Oct 07 to 30 Dec 07
- Archive 7 - 1 Jan 08 to 25 Apr 08
- Archive 8 - 30 Apr 08 to 28 Jul 08
- Archive 9 - 29 July 08 to 15 Sep 08
- Archive 10 - 17 Sep 08 to 14 Dec 08
- Archive 11 - 16 Dec 08 to 16 Feb 09
- Archive 12 - 16 Feb 09 to 16 Apr 09
- Archive 13 - 21 Apr 09 to 9 July 09
- Archive 14 - 18 July 09 to 13 Dec 09
- Archive 15 - 24 Dec 09 to 21 Feb 11
- Archive 16 - 29 Mar 11 to 23 Feb 13
- Archive 17 - 1 Mar 13 to 4 Nov 13
- Archive 18 - 11 Nov 13 to 3 Mar 14
- Archive 19 - 10 Mar 14 to 21 Jun 14
- Archive 20 - 23 Jun 14 to 5 Oct 14
- Archive 21 - 13 Oct 14 to 16 Mar 15
- Archive 22 - 19 Mar 15 to 1 Feb 16
- Archive 23 - 8 Feb 16 to ...
Tech News: 2013-45
13:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Reverted link on Boba Fett entry
Could you provide some clarity on why the Boba Fett Fan Club, at bobafett.com and online since 1996, is appropriate to be removed from the article?
- Sure: please check out Wikipedia:FANSITE#Links_normally_to_be_avoided #11. --EEMIV (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Question
Was there a particular reason why my unlogged in edits were reverted? I didn't think I add anything inconsistent with the page guidelines for fiction, and in one case your revert destroyed a table that I went in to correctly format, which has left it broken in your current version. If nothing else, you've got an obligation to fix the latter since that was a constructive edit, but before I assume that my edits were out of line or unneeded I'd like your reply on this matter. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- The edits wander into triviality. The "currently" serving language is in-universe and the assertion lazily sourced. Copyedit was sloppy, i.e. lacking proper caps. Between that and the IP, I assumed the table was similarly well-intentioned but inappropriate for the already crufty. However, it does look clean and I'll restore it. --EEMIV (talk) 07:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Can you offer substantiation for the Enterprise-J as Universe class? I don't see any third-party sourcing, online at least, beyond speculation/"an idea" by Doug Drexler. --EEMIV (talk) 07:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't add the Universe class section, I just fixed the table when I noticed it was broken since I like a tidy page. Since that was already in the article when I got here I assumed it had been added by someone who was knowledgeable about the ship, but if its questionable then go ahead and axe it. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Can you offer substantiation for the Enterprise-J as Universe class? I don't see any third-party sourcing, online at least, beyond speculation/"an idea" by Doug Drexler. --EEMIV (talk) 07:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2013-46
08:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Sector (Star Trek)
You can't prod something that's previously gone through AFD. I moved it to AFD for you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Blaster
Hello, regarding Blaster (Star Wars), I've given the article a bit of an overhaul. I was wondering if you would give it a second look? There are some additional sources out there, but I was not able to preview them. There could be more detail about the design of the weapons (especially to replace the "prop blog" passage still in the article) as well as the science behind it (whether or not it is feasible in the real world). What do you think? Erik (talk | contribs) 15:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2013-47
06:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Starfleet starships ordered by class may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- com/2008/12/09/exclusive-interview-roberto-orci-on-all-the-latest-with-star-trek-and-more/]</ref>). Its registry number, NCC-0514, comes from Abrams' birthdate of [[May 14]].
- "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy". This ship is destroyed by the simulator and you cannot save it. />
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2013-49
08:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2013-50
08:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Family name
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Family name. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2013-51
08:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-01
08:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-02
08:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-03
09:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Comedian
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Comedian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-04
10:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-05
09:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-06
08:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-07
09:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-08
08:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Anakin Skywalker.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anakin Skywalker.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-09
10:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Tech News: 2014-10
09:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.