Hi Azwaldo, it might seem strange but AbdomeN is absolutely not a candidate for deletion. The reason it exists is because the page used to be at that title a long time ago when Wikipedia used the UseMod software and all titles had to be CamelCase. This meant that single word titles had to use strange capitalization. It is quite possible that external site linked to this old title, or that people bookmarked it and never updated their links. Therefore, if we delete, we risk breaking links. It's not a huge risk, but then keeping the redirect isn't a huge hassle either, so on balance, the policy says to keep it because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of doing this. See Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion and Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy/redirects if you want more details. Angela. 22:01, Jan 4, 2004 (UTC)

A redirect from Fecal coliform bacteria to E. coli sounds a good idea. Be bold! Angela. 00:56, Jan 5, 2004 (UTC)

Hello and welcome! Generally taxoboxes should avoid sub and super categories because that complicates the table and since sub and super categories are not used as often as the regular KPCOFGS ones. But higher level taxa have fewer items in the classification part of the table so, IMO, it is not as important to exclude sub/super there. So if a sub/super category is important enough to the taxon you are writing on (this is often the case for birds and plants), then listing them in the taxobox may make sense. Above all else use your best judgment and don't forget to have fun! :) --mav 10:29, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Hi,

Concerning the Wasp page: first of all, sorry for answering late (I dont look at my user page that often); second: I quite like the opening paragraph, I think the page might as well stay that way. Tjunier 11:47, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)

No author is cited by the source; I have added a note to the file and expanded the description. azwaldo (talk)

Hi Azwaldo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, "Significant publications" in biographical article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to .

Hi Azwaldo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why is "Cultivation theory" evaluated as a biology topic?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to .

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultivation theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Cohen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for posting that question about SuggestBot’s userbox on my talk page. It was indeed an error in the documentation, which I’ve now updated to reflect that you can also use it to ask for weekly suggestions. Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 03:31, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
39		Texas brown tarantula (talk)	Add sources
714		Horse racing (talk)	Add sources
912		Erik Erikson (talk)	Add sources
1,273		Tarantula (talk)	Add sources
89		Priscillianism (talk)	Add sources
1,047		Reason (talk)	Add sources
1,586		Meditation (talk)	Cleanup
490		Affluence in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
48		Wood-free paper (talk)	Cleanup
1,772		Satanism (talk)	Expand
374		Men's rights movement (talk)	Expand
1,411		Household income in the United States (talk)	Expand
226		Unschooling (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
349		Altered state of consciousness (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
451		Pedagogy of the Oppressed (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
779		Interpersonal relationship (talk)	Merge
178		No-mind (talk)	Merge
12		Stopping thought (talk)	Merge
3		Priocnemis conformis (talk)	Wikify
34		Christianity in Gaul (talk)	Wikify
123		Entomopathogenic fungus (talk)	Wikify
21		Theories of media exposure (talk)	Orphan
3		Virtual hammock (talk)	Orphan
4		Self-transforming brain (talk)	Orphan
10		Pepsis thisbe (talk)	Stub
26		Heterodontonyx bicolor (talk)	Stub
3		Homonotus sanguinolentus (talk)	Stub
3		Epipompilus insularis (talk)	Stub
2		Episyron quinquenotatus (talk)	Stub
3		Anoplius nigerrimus (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]