^{Sample discussion of an argument evaluation}

• Refers to "the same reason as last time", that was: "This is not a case of style for promotion but a set name and following Wikipedia:Naming conventions (aircraft) is the correct way to do it."

Should be categorized as  Note N NCAIRCRAFT. — Aron

• Currently it's categorized as  Note O OFFICIAL based on: "for me the official designation by the manufacturer should be used". Both are adequate. Is there consensus by at least a few reviewers to change the category? —Aron M🍂 (🛄📤)   23:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]