Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed all changes that I made stating they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Could you exapnd on that please and give me an idea why they were inappropriate? NBS2024 (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the link provided on your talk page, about what links are appropriate for use as references, and admonitions against self-interested and promotional editing. Arllaw (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, didn't want there to be any misapprehension from the edit summary on the Crime article. I reverted editor ResearcherJCT's edits. Since your edit was on that very content, didn't want it to seem I was directing the edit summary towards you. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 05:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Arllaw (talk) 16:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elijah Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pass-through.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Fixed) Arllaw (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Twistedmath. I noticed that you recently removed content from Who Killed Tupac without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. twisted. (talk) 23:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had left a note. There is no need to promote a law firm on that article, and it should also be noted that the editor responsible for the addition can be reasonably inferred to have significant undisclosed WP:COI issues. Arllaw (talk) 23:11, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added a relevant link that explains how lawyers are advertising their services in 2025. While you've kept the text I contributed, the source link I cited was removed. I want to clarify that I have no affiliation with any of the websites I cite.

I include these links solely to add value to Wikipedia and benefit its users.

page: Legal advertising in the United States

MickelClark (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was reverted, nothing was kept. I have posted on your talk page about your conflict of interest issues. Thanks. Arllaw (talk) 23:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]