Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the NIST International School page, your edit caused a URL error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came here to apologize for a mistake. Earlier today, I saw your constructive edit on Xavier Becerra and I meant to thank you for it. However, I accidentally made a mistake and warned you instead. That was a mistake on my part. Rest assured, I have not actually removed your edit, and I have removed the incorrect warning. Thank you very much for helping us improve Wikipedia! I hope that you will stay. Sincerely, Tony Tan⁹⁸ · talk 01:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Roble Hall, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you deleted the section on Triton from Artificial Gills. As the main editor of that section, I wanted to hear your thoughts further on the topic because generally a section containing too much content isn't grounds for deletion. I understand that there's been a lot of controversy recently about this, which is why I created the section in the first place, and the length is due to what I considered a thorough analysis of both the pros and the cons of the project. I wanted to provide at least some information for anyone who may come to Wiki looking for info on this, and I'd even be so bold as to say that one of the reasons it's been so successful is that there isn't any centralized, relevant source for people to look at for further information. Daemyth (talk) 02:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at John Arrillaga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tornado chaser (talk) 21:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 21:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.