Welcome to the talk page of

Imzadi1979

---

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page.

Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.

"Imzadi1979 (public)" is an alternate account for use on public computers.

    Post a message to my talk page    

Archives
Threads older than seven days after the last reply will be archived. Thank you.

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• 12
• 13
• 14
• 15

Hello. I believe you commented on Talk:Southern Nevada#Merge into Nevada Article, but while logged out, leaving me unable to reply as you seem to prefer. If that was not you, you can disregard the rest of this message, and I apologize for wasting your time - I'm just guessing it might have been you because of the edit history of Draft:County Route 10 (Mohave County, Arizona) and overall similar focuses.

However, if that was you, could you elaborate on your opposition, please? From the other responses I got, it looks like there's consensus to merge, but before I go on ahead, I want to hear any potentially valid concerns.

Anyhow, thank you for your time, and have a wonderful evening.

--Respectfully, Dexcube (talk) 01:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dexcube: that IP is not me. That IP is located in Augusta, Georgia, a place I have never been. Imzadi 1979 → 05:20, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks for the quick response. Dexcube (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, also tagging @636Buster,

@Brotherbenz continues to misunderstand MOS:GEOLINK and is changing articles.

Wamalotpark (talk) 01:41, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. After tagging the page it's temporarily on my watchlist so I saw you draftified it. Per WP:DRAFTNO, since it's been draftified before it should not have been draftified a second time. (The exception is if you were reverting sockpuppetry, which I suspect in this case, but the report is waiting for a checkuser.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:45, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]